PP's article got my 5.30 am, waking up, foggy, half stupid brain thinkingPistolPatch wrote:Dustinj,
I have two large kettles (70L versus your 50L) and I chill and no-chill. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages. If you have an immersion chiller and are single batching, I would advise using it especially when starting out.
The immersion chiller you have built is a great investment. I would advise you to ignore no-chilling for now unless you get in a situation where you don't have a fermentor available to pitch immediately.
An immersion chiller offers many advantages not available to even commercial breweries. It's also a very safe route that only costs water. (Check on the points the guys have made above re leaks and cleanliness though.)
Using your immersion chiller at flame-out is what I have always done with my beers until I started doing the double-batches I now do. (I now drain the first half of my kettle into a cube for no-chilling and then, when that's finsihed turn on my chiller.) This method still gives me very respectable results in comps on both the no-chilled and chilled batches but I feel that the beers I used to brew by turning on the chiller at flame out had more of a snappiness/crispness to them. It's only a little thing though and, on reflection, I think I mainly pick it up on less hoppy beers such as lagers/pilsners.
What I'm trying to say is that there are hundreds of different ways to put hops into a beer and manage them. An immersion chiller turned on at flame out is a very good/primitive/solid point to start exploring hop management from so don't be scared to do it.
And, don't be scared of no-chill either!!!
Hop management - the greatest mystery in brewing,
PP


Have I invented a no need to clean, no need to sanitise, chiller that can be used for cubes as well as pots? Or does such a thing exist already?
Outflow should be larger bore than inflow as less water pressure. The surface area exposed to the cold water would be the surface area of the pot, which might be similar to (or even better than) the surface area of a wort chiller coil (calculations needed). If the pot was aluminium, the conductivity would be similar to the copper of a chiller coil. A plastic cube or a SS pot would be less conductive.