So one will get little or no CB, the other will get all of it.
4000g Galaxy Pale Pilsener
1000g Rice
330g Carapils
20g Northern Brewer 60 mins
30g Saaz 10 mins
S-189 Lager yeast.
So lets sort the sheep from the goats.

I took bottles of each down to BABBs tonight and about 7 people tried the beers without knowing which was which. It was not possible to do a blind triangle due to the nature of the venue but the general opinion was that the beers were very similar indeed but on balance most found the Cold Break one to be slightly more 'assertive'. As Ross pointed out, this could be due to the fermenter #2 getting the bulk of any hop material remaining in the cubes which could add a bit more hop flavour to #2. As the beers mature, subjectively they do seem to be less different than initially.
Aroma, clarity, colour, foam, lacing etc all indistinguishable but just that wee bit of a difference in the aftertaste and a very slight difference in mouthfeel. Which again could be attributable to more lingering hop in the cold break beer. I wonder as well if cold break, being a protein/lipid mixture might absorb a percent or two of hop oils etc, removing them from the clear part of the wort, that then get released back into the beer during fermentation?
I'm tending now to the opinion: "cold break? probably nothing to be concerned about".
Return to “BIABrewer Old Hands”
Brewers browsing this forum: No members and 3 guests