Congratulations boff on your first BIAB which I noticed you did without asking for any help

.
I see you also worked out how to use the BIABacus for yourself and that all went smoothly. Nice work

. And there is no need to fear that this beer will turn to crap. Why should it? Your next one might though,
read this post
Here's a quick check on your numbers (although we can't really learn much from one brew)...
Estimated 'Metric Sugar Points': 23.0 (volume units*) x 44 (gravity points) = 1012 'Metric Sugar Points'
Actual 'Metric Sugar Points': 25.0 x 42 = 1050
[Other measurement system users can just use their own volume units for this quick 'sugar point' check. Gravity points are the specific gravity without the 1.0 bit. In other words, a hydrometer reading of 1.042 means 42 gravity points.]
So, you were a little more efficient than the BIABacus predicted which is where we would like you to be, on average. (Individual brews and base grains can vary wildly as can your measurement sample and instruments so never be surprised on a brew to see your numbers being out. If an inconsistency repeats itself regularly, then worry.)
As for your no-chill hop question,
this post here and subsequent posts will lead you to some answers.
Good on you

,
PP
If you have found
the above or anything else of value on BIABrewer.info, consider supporting us by
getting some BIPs!