Oh no Jimmy, you haven't bought the Blichman!!!!
I hate to tell you this but I was one of the ones who bagged it and I certainly wasn't alone
. I actually gave mine away. It would have to be one of my worst brewing purchases ever. Not only did it not really even work but how much time does it take to pull apart and clean? My goodness! I bought mine a few years ago so hopefully they have changed the design? Fingers crossed.
jmb, after that buying experience, seeing a few other counter-pressure fillers in action and then speaking to some experienced brewers I now have great confidence in bottling straight from the tap into the PET bottle and have done so for about 4 years now. Quite a few of these beers have been tasted a year after bottling and the majority, say 60% have been in very good condition, 30% have been a bit flat and 10% I wouldn't drink. Most however were consumed within a few months of bottling and all these have been excellent - can't think of a single dud even when I haven't purged the bottles with CO2.
If I want to keep the bottles for some time then I first purge the bottles with CO2. If I know I will be drinking them within a week or so then I won't bother.
Secondly I assess how the keg is pouring. I have a flow-restricted tap and so most of the time I can adjust the tap so the beer pours well. In these cases, I simply put the bottle up to the tap and pour the beer on an angle. Job done!
When the beer is pouring badly, I'll pour the beer into a chilled jug first and then let the head settle. Once settled, I then pour from the jug into the bottle, once again on an angle.
CO2 that is in solution on cold beer does not, "instantly," jump out of solution. This takes time and/or temperature. Very little time and temperature difference is involved in transferring from one cold vessel to another. You'd be very unlucky to lose 5% carbonation with the first method above and 10% with the second. So, there is really no problem with carbonation loss.
The second problem is oxidation. If you purge your bottles with CO2 there is hardly any risk of oxidisation - pretty much negligible. Even if you let your beer settle in a jug before bottling it, the head, which is pretty much all CO2, protects the beer from oxygen.
The third problem is infection. A counter-flow chiller is more likely to breed and distribute some horrendous bug than the above methods that rely on brief exposure to the ambient air. Once again, even if using a jug, the head of the beer will provide great protection.
So, I reckon, the trouble and expense of a counter-pressure filler is not worth it for a start. The fact that they don't work with heady beer anyway is the finish for me. I can't think of a single reason to buy one but they are still on the market because we think, when we start kegging, that they will make poorly pouring beers pour better. They don't.
Jimmy, as a fellow brewer who has taken many for the team, I am having a commiseration beer for you now
. Just make sure that after you have used the gun for a while that you spread the word of your findings
.
Spot ya,
PP
If you have found
the above or anything else of value on BIABrewer.info, consider supporting us by
getting some BIPs!